Sapiens First · movement growth model

100k active people by September 2027.

Test what it would take to build that movement through action, recruitment, and training.

Sep 30, 2027 · Goal path test

Goal cleared

103k

active people in this scenario

This is an ambitious scenario built from unverified assumptions, not a forecast or a reported result.

Outcomes

Participation over time

Choose a month to inspect the model. Switch between total active people and the number gained or lost each month.

Sep 30, 2027 · modeled

Active totalRequired path
Cumulative active participants through September 2027Hover over the chart or use the month slider to inspect participant, member, organizer, and circle counts for each month. Coral bands mark trigger-event windows. The dashed line shows the pace required to reach 100,000 by September 2027.101001.0k10k100k1mGoalStartDec ’26Mar ’27Jun ’27Sep ’27
Model a trigger

Add a trigger event to the model

A public event can bring a short burst of attention. Add a hypothetical one to test how timing, readiness, and follow-up affect participation.

No event is modeled. The example starts in Mar ’27 for two months; you can change every assumption.

Coral bands show the months when a trigger lifts the model. This draws on Bill Moyer’s Movement Action Plan, Stage 4 (take-off). A trigger is a scenario assumption, not a scheduled event or a prediction. MAP stages can overlap; the model does not predict public opinion or policy wins. Read the Movement Action Plan.

No trigger is modeled yet. Add a hypothetical event in the panel above to see how it changes the curve.

Trigger attention is temporary. If people return and become organizers, their work continues after the attention spike ends.

Active people

103k

Sep 30, 2027 · modeled

Members

103k

People in an ongoing role

Organizers

5.2k

Trained and active in the model

See this month’s activity details

Invitations

422,842

First actions

105,711

Repeat participants

52,609

Follow-up gap

246

Members

103,120

New member roles

52,609

New organizers

2,619

Local circles

2,579

The total view uses a logarithmic scale: equal vertical gaps mean 10× growth. This is a scenario, not observed data or a forecast.

Capacity assumes local circles handle follow-up; no central direct-support staff are included.

See Q3 activity totals

Invitations

735k

First actions

184k

Repeat participants

91k

Follow-up gap

431

New member roles

91k

New organizers

4.6k

Adjust the growth dials +
Invite & return
500
25%
50%
Recruit & train
100%
15.5%
90%
95%
Starting size & capacity
40

The goal case is intentionally demanding: 500 invitations per organizer each quarter, 15.5% of eligible members becoming organizers each quarter, and 40 repeat participants per circle. Replace these assumptions with observed cohort rates as they become available.

Active participant: a distinct person completing at least two meaningful campaign actions in a rolling 12 months. A sign-up, impression, or RSVP by itself does not count. Starting counts and every conversion rate here are unverified assumptions.

Strategy

One movement. One loop.

Each horizon answers a different question: why, what mission, where, what result, and which projects get us there.

H5Purpose

Technology that serves the common good.

H4Mission

Build a movement for an AI Treaty that prevents an AI arms race.

H3Campaign

California: organize people and local leaders to build public support for a federal AI Treaty.

H2Objective · Oct 2026–Sep 2027

Build an Act → Recruit → Train system toward 100,000 active people by Sep 30, 2027.

H1Projects

Berkeley circle pilot · Fellowship-to-organizer path · practical training · California policy map.

H0Daily tasks

Stay in internal work tools; this public strategy view shows no personal assignments.

The organizing loop

01

Act

Give people a meaningful campaign action.

02

Recruit

Build relationships; invite people into an ongoing role.

03

Train

Help members lead actions and bring in more people.

Trained organizers lead the next action. Growth is only useful if people return, take responsibility, and can lead together.

Quarterly checkpoints · proposed

Ambitious targets to test, not adopted commitments or measured results.

Q4 2026 · Oct–Dec

100 active

Verify the baseline; test the Berkeley circle and connect learning to real action.

In progress · Oct 16 snapshot

Q1 2027 · Jan–Mar

1,000 active

Complete two local Act → Recruit → Train cycles; test Fellowship-to-organizer learning.

Proposed · not adopted

Q2 2027 · Apr–Jun

10,000 active

Improve the weakest measured transition; prepare next locations only with local leaders.

Proposed · not adopted

Q3 2027 · Jul–Sep

100,000 active

Scale the loop, or report the actual count, gap, and binding constraint.

Proposed · not adopted

History to date · expand quarters

March–May 2026 · reconstructed

Establish a public starting point

Public activity began in March; the brand launched April 30. The website, organization email, LinkedIn presence, and initial nonprofit paperwork were started. Berkeley campaign exploration began; the exact inception date is not established.

Q2 2026 · inferred from notes

Learn locally; build the funding path

Notes point to grant work, warm-network follow-up, local listening, and campaign research. No standalone quarterly OKR was found; broad cold outreach and a second entity were held back.

Q3 2026 · formal OKRs

Test campaigns and organizer pathways

Formal objectives covered fundraising, participation pathways, and recruitment actions. The Fellowship launched and eight volunteer contributors were reported by September. Progress against every target was not reconciled.

Q4 2026 · underway at Oct 16

Test Berkeley organizing

October direction centers on a Berkeley local-organizing pilot, member and organizer workflows, and practical learning. No formal Q4 re-baseline was found; the year-end update remains open.

Planning lenses & open alignment question

Jim Collins: improve one repeatable turn at a time.

Andy Grove: optimize the work that multiplies results across the movement.

Paul Engler: build organizers through action, relationships, and practice.

An earlier strategy memo named “landmark legislation for democratic AI by 2030.” This draft keeps the AI Treaty as the current mission and California as the campaign focus without claiming those directions have been formally reconciled.

Scorecard · what to measure+

Review monthly by cohort. Pick the weakest step to improve each quarter. Report participation separately from California policy milestones.

First action

Distinct people taking one meaningful campaign action.

Return

First-time participants who take a second action within 90 days.

Member role

Repeat participants who accept an ongoing responsibility.

Organizer

Members trained who lead an action and its follow-up.

Organizer return

Organizers who lead a second cycle and develop others.

Circle capacity

Active participants and trained co-leads in each circle.

Retention

Participants and organizers still active after 12 months.

Policy progress

Publicly verifiable milestones, tracked separately.

Public reporting uses aggregate counts only. Do not publish personal assignments or details that could identify individual participants.